|
My personal philosophy of education is closely aligned with Progressivism.
John Dewey maintains that change is essential to reality and that
knowledge is ever changing. This has proven true as scientists
uncover ever changing factual evidence.
I think children learn best using hands-on activities and group
work. To discover a basic principle through manipulative
experimentation is to assimilate that concept for life. Almost
every subject can be taught using hands-on instruction.
I agree with the Essentialism philosophy to the degree that a
child needs to learn essential facts. Some things, such as the
multiplication tables, are best learned through drill. I
differ, however, in the viewpoint that learning should be hard work
and never fun. The idea that there is no overall order an
purpose to life I find especially abhorrent.
While borrowing ideas from every philosophy, I feel Progressivism
most closely reflects my personal ideas for education. I
usually describe my philosophy as constructivist - that is, children
constructing their own knowledge using the tools and guidance I
provide.
Children should prepare to become lifelong learners.
Education does not begin or end at the schoolhouse gate. Each
of us should strive for a life of knowledge that is continuously
unfolding.
Children, especially those to whom much has been given, should be
prepared to give back to the community in the form of volunteer
services.
As optimistic as it sounds, I honestly believe that in every
child is the possibility of greatness. Obstacles may stand in
the way, but, with perseverance, they can be overcome.
I think every child can learn and wants to learn. I think
inspired teachers can kindle a flame of lifelong learning. I
think every child should be taught traditional basics, but also the
ability to enjoy everything that life has to offer. There is a
beauty and purpose to all of God's creation and each person on Earth
has a part.
|